Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs
2009566 citationsAngeloantonio Russo, Francesco PerriniJournal of Business Ethicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Angeloantonio Russo
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Angeloantonio Russo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angeloantonio Russo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angeloantonio Russo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angeloantonio Russo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angeloantonio Russo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angeloantonio Russo. The network helps show where Angeloantonio Russo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angeloantonio Russo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angeloantonio Russo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angeloantonio Russo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Angeloantonio Russo. Angeloantonio Russo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Russo, Angeloantonio, et al.. (2015). Explaining the Variation Amongst Countries in Sustainability Reporting: An Institutional Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
9.
Morrone, Domenico, et al.. (2014). CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY, GREEN MARKETING AND REPORTING: WHERE ARE WE GOING?. 23. 59–68.1 indexed citations
Russo, Angeloantonio, et al.. (2011). Introduction. European Sport Management Quarterly. 11(4). 327–335.3 indexed citations
14.
Russo, Angeloantonio & Clodia Vurro. (2010). Cross-Boundary Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in the Fuel Cell Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Russo, Angeloantonio & Antonio Tencati. (2009). Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
16.
Russo, Angeloantonio & Francesco Perrini. (2009). Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics. 91(2). 207–221.566 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Russo, Angeloantonio, et al.. (2008). Trust, Coordination and Knowledge Flows in R&D Projects. 17(1). 24–34.4 indexed citations
18.
Russo, Angeloantonio & Antonio Tencati. (2007). Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: An In-Depth Analysis of Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Enterprises. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 18. 245–250.1 indexed citations
19.
Perrini, Francesco, Angeloantonio Russo, & Antonio Tencati. (2007). CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms: Evidence from Italy. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
20.
Russo, Angeloantonio & Antonio Tencati. (2007). Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies. 74(45). 35–7.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.