Ana Aznar

554 citations
18 papers · 305 indexed · h-index 10

Ana Aznar

16 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Ana Aznar
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Clinical Psychology 157
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 78
  • Education 104
  • Social Psychology 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
Replace Els Gadeyne with:
Els Gadeyne Belgium
Eva Costa Martins Portugal
Melissa M. Menzer United States
Marisha L. Humphries United States
Marta Giménez‐Dasí Spain
Jeremy S. Cohen United States
Laura Quintanilla Spain
Maria Plötner Germany
Ju‐Hyun Song United States
Evelien Broekhof Netherlands
Ana Aznar relative to Els Gadeyne Belgium Els Gadeyne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Els Gadeyne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Aznar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Aznar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Aznar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Aznar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Aznar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Aznar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Aznar. The network helps show where Ana Aznar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Aznar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Aznar Line = papers co-authored together Ana Aznar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20225
3 20223
4 202111
5 202118
6 201914
7 20190
8 201928
9 20189
10 201710
11 201732
12
Are there gender differences in emotion understanding? Analysis of the Test of Emotion Understanding
20171
13 201610
14 20153
15 201454
16 20146
17 201349
18 200552

About Ana Aznar

Ana Aznar is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (157 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (78 citations), Education (104 citations), Social Psychology (67 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations). Ana Aznar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Ángel M. Fidalgo, Patrick J. Leman, Sarah Bayless, Paul T. Sowden, Amy Warhurst, Jo Van Herwegen, Melanie Killen, David L. Penn and Raquel López‐Carrilero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026