Allison Farber

961 citations
15 papers · 563 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Allison Farber

15 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Allison Farber
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Human-Computer Interaction 317
  • Computer Science Applications 152
  • Education 218
  • Information Systems 162
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
Replace Evan Golub with:
Evan Golub United States
Elizabeth Foss United States
Gene Chipman United States
Heléne Gelderblom South Africa
Sante Simms United States
Ahmed Kharrufa United Kingdom
Marie-Monique Schaper Spain
Angela Boltman United States
Gustav Taxén Sweden
Olof Torgersson Sweden
Allison Farber relative to Evan Golub United States Evan Golub's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Evan Golub · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Farber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Farber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Farber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Farber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Farber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Farber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Farber. The network helps show where Allison Farber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Allison Farber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison Farber Line = papers co-authored together Allison Farber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2004183
2 200575
3 200268
4 200454
5 200349
6 200338
7 200327
8
How Young Can Our Design Partners Be
200218
9 200313
10
Missed connections: Unintended consequences of updated cervical cancer screening guidelines on screening rates for sexually transmitted infections.
201513
11
How Young Can Our Technology Design Partners Be
200211
12 20017
13 20023
14
Sensing, Storytelling, and Children: Putting Users in Control
20033
15 20141

About Allison Farber

Allison Farber is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Education, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 15 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Mobile Learning in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (317 citations), Computer Science Applications (152 citations), Education (218 citations), Information Systems (162 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations). Allison Farber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Allison Druin, Gene Chipman, Mona Leigh Guha, Sante Simms, Jerry Alan Fails, Jaime Montemayor, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Benjamin B. Bederson, Anne C. Rose and Glenda Revelle. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Diabetes, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, First Monday and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact