Gene Chipman
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming
Papers in
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 7
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 3
-
- Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems 2
- Augmented Reality Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Allison Druin (9 shared papers)Mona Leigh Guha (7 shared papers)Jerry Alan Fails (5 shared papers)Sante Simms (4 shared papers)Allison Farber (6 shared papers)Jaime Montemayor (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Communications of the ACM (1 paper)Computers in entertainment (1 paper)Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (2 papers)Participatory Design Conference (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gene Chipman
9 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Human-Computer Interaction 307
- Computer Science Applications 136
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 81
- Education 182
- Management of Technology and Innovation 41
Countries citing papers authored by Gene Chipman
This map shows the geographic impact of Gene Chipman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene Chipman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene Chipman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gene Chipman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene Chipman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene Chipman. The network helps show where Gene Chipman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Gene Chipman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 183 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 6 | How Young Can Our Design Partners Be | 2002 | 18 |
| 7 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 8 | How Young Can Our Technology Design Partners Be | 2002 | 11 |
| 9 | Sensing, Storytelling, and Children: Putting Users in Control | 2003 | 3 |
About Gene Chipman
Gene Chipman is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (3 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (307 citations), Computer Science Applications (136 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations), Education (182 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (41 citations). Gene Chipman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Allison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Jerry Alan Fails, Sante Simms, Allison Farber and Jaime Montemayor. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Computers in entertainment, Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) and Participatory Design Conference.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.