The Forestry Chronicle

3.1k papers and 33.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in The Forestry Chronicle in the last decades have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Forestry Chronicle usually cover Global and Planetary Change (1.5k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k papers) and Insect Science (654 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Management and Policy (985 papers), Forest ecology and management (946 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (614 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Forestry Chronicle are David A. MacLean, A. Kozak, J. R. Blais, Alexander Dickson, Albert L. Leaf, John F. Hosner, Jean‐Claude Ruel, J. P. Kimmins, Victor J. Lieffers and B. J. Stocks.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Forestry Chronicle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Forestry Chronicle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Forestry Chronicle.

Countries where authors publish in The Forestry Chronicle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Forestry Chronicle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Forestry Chronicle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Forestry Chronicle more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025