Forest Policy and Economics

2.7k papers and 64.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Forest Policy and Economics in the last decades have received a total of 64.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Forest Policy and Economics usually cover Global and Planetary Change (2.3k papers), Economics and Econometrics (791 papers) and Strategy and Management (435 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Management and Policy (1.7k papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (1.2k papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (656 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forest Policy and Economics are Bas Arts, Jyrki Kangas, Ahmad Maryudi, Lukas Gießen, Anne Toppinen, Georg Winkel, Max Krott, Shashi Kant, Mikko Kurttila and Gerhard Weiss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forest Policy and Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forest Policy and Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forest Policy and Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Forest Policy and Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forest Policy and Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forest Policy and Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Policy and Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025