Countries where authors publish in Agroforestry Systems
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Agroforestry Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Agroforestry Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agroforestry Systems more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Agroforestry Systems
This network shows the impact of papers published in Agroforestry Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Agroforestry Systems.
About Agroforestry Systems
The 3.6k papers published in Agroforestry Systems in the last decades have received a total of 87.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Agroforestry Systems usually cover Forestry (1.8k papers), Horticulture (341 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (802 papers) specifically the topics of Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (1.4k papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (554 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (512 papers), Forest ecology and management (459 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (422 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (357 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (341 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (334 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Agroforestry Systems are P. K. R. Nair, S. Jose, Shibu Jose, Donald Kass, John Beer, Eduardo Somarriba, C.K. Ong, B. Mohan Kumar, C. A. Palm and Andrew M. Gordon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.