Journal of Forestry

3.6k papers and 48.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Journal of Forestry in the last decades have received a total of 48.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Forestry usually cover Global and Planetary Change (1.4k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (774 papers) and Ecology (540 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Management and Policy (1.1k papers), Forest ecology and management (581 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (420 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Forestry are W. Wallace Covington, Margaret M. Moore, Therese M. Poland, Deborah G. McCullough, Jack D. Cohen, Brett J. Butler, Stephen F. Arno, Kevin L. O’Hara, Jason Drake and Ralph Dubayah.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Forestry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Forestry.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Forestry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025