John F. Hosner

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

John F. Hosner is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Hosner has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 8 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in John F. Hosner's work include Seedling growth and survival studies (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers). John F. Hosner is often cited by papers focused on Seedling growth and survival studies (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers). John F. Hosner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and United Kingdom. John F. Hosner's co-authors include Albert L. Leaf, Alexander Dickson, Leon S. Minckler, Richard E. Dickson, Stephen G. Boyce, David H. Van Lear and Richard Lane and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Soil Science Society of America Journal and Forest Science.

In The Last Decade

John F. Hosner

15 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

QUALITY APPRAISAL OF WHITE SPRUCE AND WHITE PINE SEEDLING... 1960 2026 1982 2004 1960 250 500 750 1000

Peers

John F. Hosner
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Plant Science 1.1k
  • Soil Science 446
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 445
  • Ecology 264
  • Global and Planetary Change 173
Replace JS Pate with:
JS Pate Poland
D. S. H. Drennan United Kingdom
Gerard M. Bögemann Netherlands
Donald A. Jameson United States
Richard E. Francis United States
J. Waddington Canada
A. M. Wilson United States
Jorge Hugo Lemcoff Israel
Marcus Schortemeyer Australia
B. N. Richards Australia
JS Pate Poland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John F. Hosner
John F. Hosner · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John F. Hosner
John F. Hosner · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Hosner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Hosner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Hosner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Hosner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Hosner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Hosner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Hosner. The network helps show where John F. Hosner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Hosner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Hosner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Hosner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Hosner. John F. Hosner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 7
3 1
4 30
5 12
6 93
7 11
8 20
9
Hardwood reproduction in the river bottoms of Southern Illinios.
14
10 71
11 3
12
QUALITY APPRAISAL OF WHITE SPRUCE AND WHITE PINE SEEDLING STOCK IN NURSERIES breakdown →
1049
13 21
14 75
15 24
16 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026