Australian Forestry

1.8k papers and 17.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Australian Forestry in the last decades have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Forestry usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (818 papers), Global and Planetary Change (650 papers) and Ecology (401 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (587 papers), Forest Management and Policy (362 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Forestry are A. Malcolm Gill, F. G. Neumann, K. W. Cremer, Christine Stone, Lachlan McCaw, Ian Abbott, G. C. Marks, Ian Ferguson, R. Bashford and Neil Burrows.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Forestry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Forestry.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Forestry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025