Teacher Development

972 papers and 10.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 972 papers published in Teacher Development in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Teacher Development usually cover Education (829 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (142 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (132 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (524 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (207 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (148 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teacher Development are Sue Pearson, Keith S. Taber, Carol A. Mullen, John Quicke, Derin Atay, Clémentine Beauvais, J. Manuel, John P. Hughes, Vassilis Komis and Athanassios Jimoyiannis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teacher Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teacher Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teacher Development.

Countries where authors publish in Teacher Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teacher Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teacher Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teacher Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025