Folia Neuropathologica

556 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 556 papers published in Folia Neuropathologica in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Folia Neuropathologica usually cover Molecular Biology (178 papers), Neurology (123 papers) and Neurology (109 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (47 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (45 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Folia Neuropathologica are Richard A. Armstrong, Orlando J. Castejón, Allison Gregory, Susan J. Hayflick, Teresa Wierzba‐Bobrowicz, Robert P. Strosznajder, Anna‐Maria Barciszewska, Joanna B. Strosznajder, Ewa Matyja and Tomasz Stępień.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Folia Neuropathologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Folia Neuropathologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Folia Neuropathologica.

Countries where authors publish in Folia Neuropathologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Folia Neuropathologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Folia Neuropathologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folia Neuropathologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025