Food Science and Human Wellness

711 papers and 20.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 711 papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness in the last decades have received a total of 20.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness usually cover Molecular Biology (297 papers), Food Science (207 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (136 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (98 papers), Gut microbiota and health (76 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Science and Human Wellness are Chi‐Tang Ho, B. M. Bohrer, Shiming Li, Kruthi Doriya, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, Xin Zheng, Peter Chi Keung Cheung, Wenyi Kang, Baojun Xu and Lilis Nuraida.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness.

Countries where authors publish in Food Science and Human Wellness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Science and Human Wellness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Science and Human Wellness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Science and Human Wellness more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025