Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

772 papers and 18.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 772 papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 18.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (457 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (419 papers) and Philosophy (208 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (296 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (204 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (182 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry are Max Coltheart, Robyn Langdon, Peter Brugger, Anthony S. David, Rhiannon Corcoran, Julie D. Henry, Lisa Bortolotti, Steffen Moritz, Richard J. Siegert and Keith R. Laws.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Neuropsychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025