Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

1.3k papers and 32.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 32.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (572 papers), Social Psychology (320 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (254 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (176 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (157 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences are Annaliese K. Beery, Tobias Brosch, Daniel L. Schacter, Jean Decety, Bridget Callaghan, Joseph Henrich, Nim Tottenham, Steve W. Cole, Roland G. Benoit and Karl K. Szpunar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025