Natural Hazards Review

955 papers and 21.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 955 papers published in Natural Hazards Review in the last decades have received a total of 21.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Hazards Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (411 papers), Global and Planetary Change (354 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (291 papers) specifically the topics of Disaster Management and Resilience (395 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (307 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Hazards Review are David R. Godschalk, Michael K. Lindell, Carla S. Prater, John H. Sorensen, Hugh Gladwin, Nicole Dash, Roger A. Pielke, Brian Wolshon, Susan L. Cutter and John J. Vargo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Hazards Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Hazards Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Hazards Review.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Hazards Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Hazards Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Hazards Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Hazards Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025