Science & Education

1.8k papers and 24.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Science & Education in the last decades have received a total of 24.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Science & Education usually cover Education (962 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (573 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (480 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (782 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (418 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (299 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science & Education are Michael P. Clough, Mike U. Smith, Douglas Allchin, Michael R. Matthews, Sibel Erduran, Kostas Kampourakis, William F. McComas, Robert Nola, Eduardo Fleury Mortimer and Sharon Bailin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science & Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science & Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science & Education.

Countries where authors publish in Science & Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science & Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science & Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science & Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025