Pain Management Nursing

1.4k papers and 22.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Pain Management Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 22.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Pain Management Nursing usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (617 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (557 papers) and Pharmacology (428 papers) specifically the topics of Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (570 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (500 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (399 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pain Management Nursing are Keela Herr, Karen S. Feldt, Chris Pasero, Carmen Rodrı́guez, Patrick J. Coyne, Margo McCaffery, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Renee C.B. Manworren, April Hazard Vallerand and Céline Gélinas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pain Management Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pain Management Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pain Management Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Pain Management Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pain Management Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pain Management Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pain Management Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025