Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

2.4k papers and 29.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 29.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice usually cover Pharmacology (555 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (544 papers) and Surgery (509 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (553 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (396 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (280 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice are Elizabeth Dean, Adriaan Louw, Emilio J. Puentedura, Richard W. Bohannon, Kory Zimney, Ina Diener, David Nicholls, Catherine Sackley, Barbara E. Gibson and Kathy Stiller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physiotherapy Theory and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiotherapy Theory and Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025