John Baer

11.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
100 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

John Baer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John Baer has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 12 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in John Baer's work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (63 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (21 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (17 papers). John Baer is often cited by papers focused on Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (63 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (21 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (17 papers). John Baer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Colombia. John Baer's co-authors include James C. Kaufman, Jason C. Cole, Jonathan A. Plucker, Claudia Gentile, Janel D. Sexton, David G. DeNardo, Brett L. Knolhoff, Roy F. Baumeister, Ryan C. Fields and Roni Reiter‐Palmon and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

John Baer

98 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultura... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 2024 2024 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Baer United States 44 4.5k 1.4k 1.1k 1.0k 860 100 6.5k
Kyung Hee Kim United States 25 1.8k 0.4× 673 0.5× 425 0.4× 201 0.2× 370 0.4× 47 2.6k
Elena L. Grigorenko United States 56 2.4k 0.5× 2.2k 1.6× 1.6k 1.5× 85 0.1× 3.4k 4.0× 354 10.5k
Daniel L. Schwartz United States 44 1.8k 0.4× 1.0k 0.8× 819 0.8× 369 0.4× 4.0k 4.7× 173 9.9k
David W. Chan Hong Kong 49 936 0.2× 348 0.3× 1.4k 1.3× 32 0.0× 899 1.0× 228 7.5k
David Wood Australia 44 395 0.1× 279 0.2× 458 0.4× 83 0.1× 3.1k 3.6× 178 11.0k
Mark Perry United Kingdom 34 647 0.1× 477 0.3× 1.9k 1.7× 97 0.1× 134 0.2× 146 7.6k
Ronald Carter United Kingdom 41 1.3k 0.3× 1.6k 1.2× 507 0.5× 11 0.0× 1.5k 1.7× 169 6.7k
Maciej Karwowski Poland 45 3.8k 0.8× 1.2k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 253 0.2× 786 0.9× 177 6.2k
Frank Barron United States 23 2.8k 0.6× 965 0.7× 990 0.9× 343 0.3× 464 0.5× 50 4.5k
Michael P. Lynch United States 36 773 0.2× 698 0.5× 265 0.2× 83 0.1× 644 0.7× 145 6.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Baer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Baer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Baer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Baer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Baer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Baer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Baer. The network helps show where John Baer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Baer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Baer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Baer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Baer. John Baer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grierson, Patrick, Rama Suresh, Andrea Wang‐Gillam, et al.. (2025). Neoadjuvant BMS-813160, Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, and Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 31(17). 3644–3651.
2.
Belle, Jad I., John Baer, Xiuting Liu, et al.. (2024). Senescence Defines a Distinct Subset of Myofibroblasts That Orchestrates Immunosuppression in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discovery. 14(7). 1324–1355. 56 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Taylor, Isaiah, O. Rahul Patharkar, Che‐Wei Hsu, et al.. (2024). Arabidopsis uses a molecular grounding mechanism and a biophysical circuit breaker to limit floral abscission signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(44). e2405806121–e2405806121. 2 indexed citations
4.
Herzog, Brett H., John Baer, Nicholas Borcherding, et al.. (2023). Tumor-associated fibrosis impairs immune surveillance and response to immune checkpoint blockade in non–small cell lung cancer. Science Translational Medicine. 15(699). eadh8005–eadh8005. 44 indexed citations
5.
Baer, John, Brett L. Knolhoff, Graham D. Hogg, et al.. (2023). Systemic Alterations in Type-2 Conventional Dendritic Cells Lead to Impaired Tumor Immunity in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Immunology Research. 11(8). 1055–1067. 13 indexed citations
6.
Lander, Varintra E., Jad I. Belle, Natalie L. Kingston, et al.. (2022). Stromal Reprogramming by FAK Inhibition Overcomes Radiation Resistance to Allow for Immune Priming and Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Cancer Discovery. 12(12). 2774–2799. 66 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, Isaiah, et al.. (2019). Hypermorphic SERK1 Mutations Function via a SOBIR1 Pathway to Activate Floral Abscission Signaling. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 180(2). 1219–1229. 10 indexed citations
8.
Baer, John. (2016). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 11 indexed citations
9.
Baer, John, Isaiah Taylor, & John C. Walker. (2016). Disrupting ER-associated protein degradation suppresses the abscission defect of a weak hae hsl2 mutant in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 67(18). 5473–5484. 11 indexed citations
10.
Baer, John. (2015). Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities. 1 indexed citations
11.
Baer, John. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint.. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 21(1). 73–100. 23 indexed citations
12.
Baer, John. (2011). Why teachers should assume creativity is very domain specific.. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 8 indexed citations
13.
Baer, John. (2010). Lectures May Be More Effective Than You Think: The Learning Pyramid Unmasked. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 20(2). 7–21. 4 indexed citations
14.
Baer, John, James C. Kaufman, & Matt L. Riggs. (2009). Brief report: Rater-domain interactions in the consensual assessment technique.. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 19(2). 87–92. 26 indexed citations
15.
Kaufman, James C., Robert J. Sternberg, John Baer, et al.. (2006). The International Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 204 indexed citations
16.
Agars, Mark D., John Baer, & James C. Kaufman. (2005). The Many Creativities of Business and the APT Model of Creativity. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 15(2). 133–141. 7 indexed citations
17.
Baer, John. (1994). Why You Shouldn't Trust Creativity Tests.. Educational leadership. 51(4). 80–83. 50 indexed citations
18.
Baer, John. (1994). Why You Still Shouldn't Trust Creativity Tests.. Educational leadership. 52(2). 72–73. 28 indexed citations
19.
Baer, John. (1988). Let's Not Handicap Able Thinkers.. Educational leadership. 45(7). 66–72. 3 indexed citations
20.
Baer, John, et al.. (1985). If Wishes Were Fishes, This Proposal to Liberalize Teacher Sabbatical Policies Would Be a Whale of a Good Idea for Your School Board.. ˜The œAmerican school board journal. 172(8). 28–29. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026