Renaissance Drama
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Classics top 10%
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesMedieval Literature and History
In The Last Decade
Renaissance Drama
214 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Literature and Literary Theory 474
- History 235
- Sociology and Political Science 159
- Anthropology 144
- Classics 107
Countries where authors publish in Renaissance Drama
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renaissance Drama. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renaissance Drama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renaissance Drama more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Renaissance Drama
This network shows the impact of papers published in Renaissance Drama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renaissance Drama.
About Renaissance Drama
The 407 papers published in Renaissance Drama in the last decades have received a total of 870 indexed citations . Papers published in Renaissance Drama usually cover Classics (86 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (188 papers) and Museology (43 papers) specifically the topics of Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (118 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (77 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renaissance Drama are Kim Hall, Gail Kern Paster, Leah S. Marcus, Jonathan Dollimore, Dieter Mehl, Michael D. Bristol, Henry S. Turner, Jyotsna G. Singh, Catherine Belsey and Michael Neill.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.