Dieter Mehl

948 total citations
34 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Dieter Mehl is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Dieter Mehl has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 11 papers in Classics and 4 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Dieter Mehl's work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers). Dieter Mehl is often cited by papers focused on Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers). Dieter Mehl collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Dieter Mehl's co-authors include Bernd D. Erdtmann, Joachim Reitner, Michael Steiner, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, William Montgomery, Stanley Wells, William A. Armstrong, W. David Kay and D. H. Lawrence and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, Shakespeare Quarterly and Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte.

In The Last Decade

Dieter Mehl

20 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Dieter Mehl
Jesse L. Byock United States
John Reuben Davies United Kingdom
Glyn Daniel United States
Denis Sinor United States
P. D. A. Harvey United Kingdom
R. A. Skelton United Kingdom
Charles W. Arnade United States
L. Richardson United Kingdom
Stuart Piggott United Kingdom
Jesse L. Byock United States
Dieter Mehl
Citations per year, relative to Dieter Mehl Dieter Mehl (= 1×) peers Jesse L. Byock

Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Mehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Mehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Mehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Mehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Mehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Mehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Mehl. The network helps show where Dieter Mehl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dieter Mehl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dieter Mehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dieter Mehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dieter Mehl. Dieter Mehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mehl, Dieter. (2014). English Literature in the Age of Chaucer. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mehl, Dieter. (2012). Helen Cooper: Shakespeare and the Medieval World. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mehl, Dieter. (2011). The Complete Letters of Henry James, 1872–1876. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mehl, Dieter, et al.. (2007). The reception of D.H. Lawrence in Europe. Bloomsbury eBooks. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lawrence, D. H., et al.. (2006). The woman who rode away ; St. Mawr ; The princess. Penguin Books.
6.
Kay, W. David, et al.. (2006). Plotting Early Modern London: New Essays on Jacobean City Comedy. The Modern Language Review. 101(4). 1088–1088. 10 indexed citations
7.
Lawrence, D. H., et al.. (1999). The first and second Lady Chatterley novels. 5 indexed citations
8.
Steiner, Michael, Dieter Mehl, Joachim Reitner, & Bernd D. Erdtmann. (1993). Oldest entirely preserved sponges and other fossils from the Lowermost Cambrian and a new facies reconstruction of the Yangtze platform (China). Geo-Leo e-docs (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation). 9. 293–329. 138 indexed citations
9.
Mehl, Dieter, Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, & William Montgomery. (1990). William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. The Yearbook of English Studies. 20. 248–248. 76 indexed citations
10.
Mehl, Dieter. (1987). Shakespeare's Tragedies: An Introduction. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations
11.
Mehl, Dieter. (1978). Chaucer's Audience. 9 indexed citations
12.
Mehl, Dieter. (1977). Der englische Roman bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts.
13.
Mehl, Dieter, et al.. (1977). Narrative Possibilities of the Tail-Rime Romance. The Yearbook of English Studies. 7. 199–199. 3 indexed citations
14.
Mehl, Dieter, et al.. (1971). The Middle English Romances of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries. The Yearbook of English Studies. 1. 209–209. 28 indexed citations
15.
Mehl, Dieter. (1970). Das englische Drama : vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
16.
Wilson, R. M., et al.. (1970). The Middle English Romances of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries. The Modern Language Review. 65(2). 368–368. 6 indexed citations
17.
Mehl, Dieter. (1969). Emblems in English Renaissance Drama. Renaissance Drama. 2. 39–57. 5 indexed citations
18.
Armstrong, William A. & Dieter Mehl. (1968). The Elizabethan Dumb Show. The History of a Dramatic Convention. The Modern Language Review. 63(1). 174–174. 10 indexed citations
19.
Mehl, Dieter. (1967). Die mittelenglischen Romanzen des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts.
20.
Honigmann, E. A. J. & Dieter Mehl. (1965). Die Pantomime im Drama der Shakespearezeit: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Dumb Show. The Modern Language Review. 60(2). 247–247.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026