Michael Neill
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 9
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 2
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History 2
- History top 2%
- Museology top 5%
-
- Irish and British Studies 5
-
- Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research 3
-
- Philippine History and Culture 3
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Patricia G. ParkerVirginia Mason VaughanJohn KerriganJohn MarstonMacDonald P. JacksonAaron MillerDavid SchalkwykByungik Chang
- Journals
- Shakespeare Quarterly (8 papers)Renaissance Drama (5 papers)The Modern Language Review (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Neill
22 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Literature and Literary Theory 151
- Classics 27
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 34
- History 63
- Museology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Neill. The network helps show where Michael Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Oxford handbook of Shakespearean tragedy | 2018 | 1 |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 6 | The renegado, or, The gentleman of Venice | 2010 | 1 |
| 7 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 8 | You Can Have What You Want | 2006 | 0 |
| 9 | Special section, Shakespeare and the bonds of service | 2005 | 1 |
| 10 | 1998 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 64 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 18 | Guerrillas and Gangs: Frantz Fanon and V. S. Naipaul | 1982 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 |
About Michael Neill
Michael Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Philosophy, Music and Anthropology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (9 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (151 citations), Classics (27 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (34 citations), History (63 citations) and Museology (20 citations). Michael Neill has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia G. Parker, Virginia Mason Vaughan, John Kerrigan, John Marston, MacDonald P. Jackson, Aaron Miller, David Schalkwyk, Byungik Chang, Sara Steen and Susan Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, The Modern Language Review, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 and Notes and Queries.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.