This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Criticism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Criticism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criticism more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Criticism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Criticism.
About Criticism
The 455 papers published in Criticism in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Criticism usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (183 papers), Music (35 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 papers), Cultural Studies (52 papers) and History (59 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (47 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (41 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (39 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (34 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (30 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (24 papers), Race, History, and American Society (24 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Criticism are Fred Moten, Michael Rothberg, Heather Love, Thomas Leitch, Richard Grusin, Vanessa Agnew, Alexander Cook, Catherine Rottenberg, Robert S. Lehman and Andreas Huyssen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.