Countries where authors publish in Eighteenth-Century Life
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eighteenth-Century Life. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eighteenth-Century Life more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life
This network shows the impact of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life.
About Eighteenth-Century Life
The 352 papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life in the last decades have received a total of 795 indexed citations . Papers published in Eighteenth-Century Life usually cover Museology (47 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (105 papers) and History (98 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (61 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (45 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (43 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (34 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (32 papers), Philippine History and Culture (26 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (24 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eighteenth-Century Life are Lynn Festa, Sandro Jung, Nicholas Rogers, Deirdre Coleman, Eve Tavor Bannet, Richard Terry, Ashley Marshall, Tobias Menely, Nicholas Hudson and David Porter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.