Philological quarterly

341 papers and 611 indexed citations

About

The 341 papers published in Philological quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 611 indexed citations. Papers published in Philological quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (129 papers), Classics (94 papers) and History (73 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (84 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (25 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philological quarterly are Kathryn Hume, Robert Markley, Frederick Buell, Juan Antonio Garrido Ardila, Bernard McKenna, Ashley Marshall, Laurie Finke, Tim William Machan, Mark Llewellyn and Leonard Neidorf.

In The Last Decade

Philological quarterly

152 papers receiving 256 citations

Countries where authors publish in Philological quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philological quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philological quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philological quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Philological quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philological quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philological quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026