Philological quarterly

343 papers and 500 indexed citations i.

About

The 343 papers published in Philological quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 500 indexed citations. Papers published in Philological quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (129 papers), Classics (95 papers) and History (74 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (85 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (25 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philological quarterly are Kathryn Hume, Robert Markley, Frederick Buell, Bernard McKenna, Ashley Marshall, Thomas C. Kennedy, Melanie Heyworth, Laurie Finke, Mark Llewellyn and Helen Burke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philological quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philological quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philological quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Philological quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philological quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philological quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philological quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025