International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
About
In The Last Decade
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
1.8k papers receiving 34.0k citations
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education more than expected).
- Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis (1995)
- Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education? (1998)
- Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research (2003)
- Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology (2013)
- Poststructural feminism in education: An overview (2000)
- The posts continue: becoming (2013)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.