Pharmacological Reports

2.6k papers and 53.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Pharmacological Reports in the last decades have received a total of 53.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacological Reports usually cover Molecular Biology (841 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (609 papers) and Physiology (456 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (354 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (177 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (174 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacological Reports are Anil Kumar, Arti Singh, Stanisław J. Czuczwar, Jarogniew J. Łuszczki, Bogusław Okopień, Halina Car, Charlotte Lawson, Sabine Wolf, Karolina H. Markiewicz and Katarzyna Niemirowicz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmacological Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacological Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacological Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacological Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacological Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacological Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacological Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026