The Journal of Portfolio Management

2.6k papers and 52.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management in the last decades have received a total of 52.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management usually cover Finance (1.5k papers), Economics and Econometrics (976 papers) and Accounting (560 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1.2k papers), Housing Market and Economics (317 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (283 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Portfolio Management are William F. Sharpe, Robert E. Whaley, Fischer Black, Andrew W. Lo, Richard Roll, Meir Statman, Clifford S. Asness, William T. Ziemba, Richard C. Grinold and Barr Rosenberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Portfolio Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Portfolio Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Portfolio Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Portfolio Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025