Clinical Breast Cancer

2.4k papers and 41.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer in the last decades have received a total of 41.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer usually cover Oncology (1.5k papers), Cancer Research (1.2k papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (530 papers) specifically the topics of Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1.1k papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (550 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (479 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Breast Cancer are Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Joseph A. Sparano, Lisa A. Carey, Carey K. Anders, Marilyn A. Owens, Bruce Horten, Clifford A. Hudis, Stephen E. Jones, Gabriel N. Hortobágyi and Martine Piccart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Breast Cancer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Breast Cancer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Breast Cancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Breast Cancer more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025