Public Personnel Management

1.6k papers and 20.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Public Personnel Management in the last decades have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Personnel Management usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (358 papers), Public Administration (295 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (250 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (246 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (208 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Personnel Management are Thomas Li‐Ping Tang, Gary E. Roberts, Meghna Sabharwal, Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Ting Yuan, Jitendra Mohan Mishra, Leonard Bright, James Gerard Caillier, Carole L. Jurkiewicz and Eran Vigoda‐Gadot.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Personnel Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Personnel Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Personnel Management.

Countries where authors publish in Public Personnel Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Personnel Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Personnel Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Personnel Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025