Industrial and Corporate Change

1.6k papers and 79.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change in the last decades have received a total of 79.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change usually cover Economics and Econometrics (923 papers), Strategy and Management (672 papers) and Accounting (276 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (453 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (453 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (195 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Industrial and Corporate Change are Henry Chesbrough, Steven Klepper, David J. Teece, Stefano Breschi, P Cooke, Mariana Mazzucato, Keith Pavitt, Ikujiro Nonaka, Richard N. Langlois and Franco Malerba.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change.

Countries where authors publish in Industrial and Corporate Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Industrial and Corporate Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Industrial and Corporate Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Industrial and Corporate Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025