This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Parergon. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Parergon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parergon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Parergon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Parergon.
About Parergon
The 507 papers published in Parergon in the last decades have received a total of 773 indexed citations . Papers published in Parergon usually cover Classics (216 papers), History (223 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (89 papers), Anthropology (55 papers) and Museology (19 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (186 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (66 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (54 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (40 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (31 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (31 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (28 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Parergon are Patricia Crawford, John R. C. Martyn, Harold Love, Andrew Lynch, Jacqueline Broad, Conal Condren, Susan Broomhall, John H. Pryor, Stephanie Trigg and Susan Clarke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.