Robert Markley

82 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Robert Markley
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
  • History and Philosophy of Science 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 180
  • Literature and Literary Theory 98
Replace Richard Wollheim with:
Richard Wollheim United States
William E. Smythe Canada
George Boas Australia
Warren D. TenHouten United States
Paul G. Keil Australia
Daniel L. Everett United States
Benjamin N. Colby United States
Joelle M. Abi-Rached United Kingdom
Ronald de Sousa Canada
David Woodruff Smith United States
Robert Markley relative to Richard Wollheim United States Richard Wollheim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Richard Wollheim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Markley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Markley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Markley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Markley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Markley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Markley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Markley. The network helps show where Robert Markley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Markley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Markley Line = papers co-authored together Robert Markley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197074
2 200547
3 199346
4 198744
5 198337
6 199735
7 198533
8 198531
9 198323
10 197121
11 200018
12 200516
13 198715
14
The Mozart effect: musical phenomenon or musical preference? A more ecologically valid reconsideration
200712
15 197512
16 199211
17 201110
18 19739
19 19759
20 19699

About Robert Markley

Robert Markley is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Philippine History and Culture (6 papers), Cognitive and psychological constructs research (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (98 citations). Robert Markley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cameron J. Camp, Jack J. Kramer, Stanley J. Rule, Dwight W. Curtis, Laura Schechter, Deirdre A. Kramer, Jan D. Sinnott, John C. Cavanaugh, Kenneth R. Olson and Robert Merrihew Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Configurations, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Comparative drama, Experimental Aging Research and Genre.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026