Laurie Finke
- Classics top 2%
- History top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas J. FarrellRobert C. DavisVincent B. LeitchBarbara JohnsonJeffrey J. WilliamsRobert MarkleyWilliam E. Cain
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (7 papers)Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers)South African History and Culture (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Laurie Finke
29 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Classics 71
- History 60
- Literature and Literary Theory 57
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- Language and Linguistics 21
Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Finke
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Finke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Finke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Finke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Finke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Finke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Finke. The network helps show where Laurie Finke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurie Finke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurie Finke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurie Finke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurie Finke. Laurie Finke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Cinematic Illuminations: The Middle Ages on Film | 6 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Profiting from the Past: History as Symbolic Capital in the Historia Regum Britanniae | 8 |
| 13 | Aphra Behn and the ideological construction of restoration literary theory | 6 |
| 14 | Mystical Bodies and the Dialogics of Vision | 6 |
| 15 | Medieval texts & contemporary readers | 2 |
| 16 | A Philosophic Wanton: Language and Authority in Wollstonecraft's Vindication of the Rights of Woman | 1 |
| 17 | To Knytte Up Al This Feeste: The Parson's Rhetoric and the Ending of the Canterbury Tales | 4 |
| 18 | The Satire of Women Writers in the Female Wits | 4 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | "Crabbed Eloquence" : dialectics of style and structure in Piers Plowman | 1 |
About Laurie Finke
Laurie Finke is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 41 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers) and South African History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (71 citations), History (60 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (57 citations). Laurie Finke has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Farrell, Robert C. Davis, Vincent B. Leitch, Barbara Johnson, Jeffrey J. Williams, Robert Markley and William E. Cain. Their work appears in journals such as Signs, Educational Philosophy and Theory and College English.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.