Mark Llewellyn
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- History top 5%
- Topics
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers)Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers)Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of ParamedicineInformation and Software TechnologyEnvironment and Planning D Society and Space
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Llewellyn
19 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Literature and Literary Theory 105
- Sociology and Political Science 62
- Urban Studies 53
- Geography, Planning and Development 42
- History 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Llewellyn
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Llewellyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Llewellyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Llewellyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Llewellyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Llewellyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Llewellyn. The network helps show where Mark Llewellyn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Llewellyn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Llewellyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Llewellyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Llewellyn. Mark Llewellyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | What is neo-victorian studies? | 22 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Preliminary Assessment of Fallout From the 1976-78 Nuclear Weapons Tests Conducted by the People's Republic of China | 0 |
About Mark Llewellyn
Mark Llewellyn is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Conservation and Urban Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (105 citations), Urban Studies (53 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations). Mark Llewellyn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ann Heilmann, Mohiuddin Ahmed, M.A. Bassiouni, Amar Mukherjee and Robert L. Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Information and Software Technology and Environment and Planning D Society and Space.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.