Milton Quarterly

541 papers and 801 indexed citations i.

About

The 541 papers published in Milton Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 801 indexed citations. Papers published in Milton Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (96 papers), Anthropology (94 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (74 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Literary Studies (89 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (49 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Milton Quarterly are Michael Wilding, John T. Shawcross, Gordon Campbell, John K. Hale, William Poole, Nicholas von Maltzahn, Karen L. Edwards, Thomas N. Corns, Dennis Danielson and Leah S. Marcus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Milton Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Milton Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Milton Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Milton Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Milton Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Milton Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milton Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025