Language learning & technology

676 papers and 21.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 676 papers published in Language learning & technology in the last decades have received a total of 21.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Language learning & technology usually cover Language and Linguistics (297 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (199 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (179 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (245 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (132 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language learning & technology are Robert Godwin‐Jones, Julie A. Belz, Carol A. Chapelle, Lina Lee, Robert R. Blake, Robert O’Dowd, Steven L. Thorne, Khalid Al-Seghayer, Susana M. Sotillo and Lara Lomicka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Language learning & technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language learning & technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language learning & technology.

Countries where authors publish in Language learning & technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language learning & technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language learning & technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language learning & technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025