Emotion Review

823 papers and 29.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 823 papers published in Emotion Review in the last decades have received a total of 29.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Emotion Review usually cover Social Psychology (584 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (356 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 papers) specifically the topics of Emotions and Moral Behavior (393 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (179 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emotion Review are Bernard Rimé, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Elizabeth A. Kensinger, Agnes Moors, Carroll E. Izard, Jean Decety, Klaus R. Scherer, James J. Gross, Robert W. Levenson and Phoebe C. Ellsworth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Emotion Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emotion Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emotion Review.

Countries where authors publish in Emotion Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emotion Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emotion Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emotion Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025