Library Management

1.5k papers and 12.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Library Management in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Library Management usually cover Library and Information Sciences (685 papers), Information Systems (549 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (169 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (560 papers), Library Science and Administration (369 papers) and Web and Library Services (251 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library Management are Jennifer Rowley, Ian Smith, Stuart Hannabuss, Kanwal Ameen, Sheila Corrall, Linda Ashcroft, Chiao‐Chen Chang, Paul Genoni, Konstantina Martzoukou and Robert Farrell.

In The Last Decade

Library Management

1.2k papers receiving 9.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Library Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Library Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library Management.

Countries where authors publish in Library Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026