Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · 1×
×1.04k/4kLIS
×1.12k/2kCOMMU
×0.91k/2kISM
×0.95k/5kIS
×1.0614/603CSA
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Library Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library Review more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Library Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library Review.
About Library Review
The 1.3k papers published in Library Review in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Library Review usually cover Library and Information Sciences (585 papers), Conservation (97 papers), Information Systems (463 papers), Communication (105 papers) and Information Systems and Management (69 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (429 papers), Library Science and Administration (367 papers), Web and Library Services (195 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (129 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (91 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (72 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (56 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library Review are Nicholas Joint, Andrea De Mauro, Michele Grimaldi, Marco Greco, Jennifer Rowley, George Macgregor, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Qun G. Jiao, David McMenemy and Ali Shiri.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.