The Electronic Library

2.1k papers and 17.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in The Electronic Library in the last decades have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Electronic Library usually cover Information Systems (960 papers), Library and Information Sciences (281 papers) and Information Systems and Management (269 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (326 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (277 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (229 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Electronic Library are Philip Calvert, Philip Barker, Maurice Β. Line, Madely du Preez, Stephen M. Mutula, Khalid Mahmood, Anne Morris, Mae Keary, Ina Fourie and Frank Parry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Electronic Library

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Electronic Library. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Electronic Library.

Countries where authors publish in The Electronic Library

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Electronic Library. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Electronic Library with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Electronic Library more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025