Countries citing papers authored by Sheila Corrall
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheila Corrall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheila Corrall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheila Corrall more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheila Corrall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheila Corrall. The network helps show where Sheila Corrall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheila Corrall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheila Corrall.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheila Corrall based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sheila Corrall. Sheila Corrall is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Corrall, Sheila. (2016). Library space assessment: A review and professional education case study.. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).1 indexed citations
5.
Corrall, Sheila. (2015). The Open Movement in Higher Education. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).
6.
Corrall, Sheila. (2014). Library Service Capital: The Case for Measuring and Managing Intangible Assets. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 13.6 indexed citations
7.
Corrall, Sheila. (2013). The Quarterly Interview: Sheila Corrall. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 40(2). 6.1 indexed citations
8.
Corrall, Sheila. (2013). A competency framework for digital curation and data science. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).1 indexed citations
9.
Corrall, Sheila, et al.. (2012). Information Resource Development and “Collection” in the Digital Age: Conceptual Frameworks and New Definitions for the Network World. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 12.8 indexed citations
10.
Corrall, Sheila, Mary Anne Kennan, & Waseem Afzal. (2012). Changes in Academic Libraries: Evolution and Innovation in Research Support Services. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 12.3 indexed citations
Corrall, Sheila. (2007). Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: Towards a working model. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 12.25 indexed citations
Streatfield, David, et al.. (2007). Evaluation of Leading Modern Public Libraries: Final report prepared for the Leading Modern Public Libraries Steering Group by Information Management Associates and the Centre for the Public Library and Information in Society, University of Sheffield, December 2006.. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).
15.
Corrall, Sheila. (1996). Creating change without chaos: Preparing libraries for the 21st century. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 66–77.1 indexed citations
16.
Corrall, Sheila. (1995). An evolving service: Managing change.. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).2 indexed citations
17.
Corrall, Sheila. (1994). Information specialists of the future: Professional development and renewal. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 1–11.1 indexed citations
Corrall, Sheila. (1988). Collection development: Options for effective management.. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).2 indexed citations
20.
Corrall, Sheila, et al.. (1985). Women in libraries. New Library World. 86(4). 71–77.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.