Library trends

1.8k papers and 16.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Library trends in the last decades have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Library trends usually cover Library and Information Sciences (679 papers), Information Systems (555 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (191 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Administration (526 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (420 papers) and Web and Library Services (210 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library trends are Marilyn Domas White, Emily Marsh, He Qin, P. Bryan Heidorn, Don Fallis, Wolfgang Glänzel, Hannelore B. Rader, Hope A. Olson, Barbara H. Kwaśnik and Lynda Baker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Library trends

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Library trends. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library trends.

Countries where authors publish in Library trends

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library trends. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library trends with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library trends more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025