JAMA Cardiology

1.2k papers and 60.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in JAMA Cardiology in the last decades have received a total of 60.1k indexed citations. Papers published in JAMA Cardiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (822 papers), Surgery (331 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (139 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (156 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (132 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAMA Cardiology are Scott D. Solomon, Gregg C. Fonarow, Orly Vardeny, Payam Safavi‐Naeini, Mohammad Madjid, Hairong Wang, Xiaoyan Wu, Yongzhen Fan, Tao Guo and Lin Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JAMA Cardiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAMA Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAMA Cardiology.

Countries where authors publish in JAMA Cardiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAMA Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAMA Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAMA Cardiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025