This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Future Foods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Future Foods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Future Foods more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Future Foods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Future Foods.
About Future Foods
The 733 papers published in Future Foods in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Future Foods usually cover Food Science (378 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (172 papers), Biochemistry (61 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (88 papers) and Insect Science (85 papers) specifically the topics of Food composition and properties (111 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (97 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (93 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (84 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (70 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (58 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (57 papers) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Future Foods are Christopher Bryant, Benu Adhikari, Uday S. Annapure, Somnath Basak, Anil Kumar Anal, Sushil Koirala, Adriana Pavesi Arisseto Bragotto, Eric Keven Silva, Feng Xue and Sirli Rosenvald.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.