Countries where authors publish in Technical Communication
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technical Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technical Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technical Communication more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Technical Communication
This network shows the impact of papers published in Technical Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technical Communication.
About Technical Communication
The 217 papers published in Technical Communication in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Technical Communication usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (30 papers), Communication (20 papers) and Computer Science Applications (11 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (18 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (14 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (12 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers) and Digital Communication and Language (7 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technical Communication are Clay Spinuzzi, E. Brumberger, Jan H. Spyridakis, Menno D.T. de Jong, Hans van der Meij, M.F. Steehouder, Jo Mackiewicz, Claire Lauer, Michael Alley and Thea van der Geest.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.