Educational Technology & Society

1.6k papers and 39.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Educational Technology & Society in the last decades have received a total of 39.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Technology & Society usually cover Education (783 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (638 papers) and Computer Science Applications (360 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (491 papers), Online and Blended Learning (482 papers) and Mobile Learning in Education (166 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Technology & Society are Sung Youl Park, Chin‐Chung Tsai, James Layton, Ching Sing Chai, Gwo‐Jen Hwang, Shih-Hsien Yang, Stephen J.H. Yang, Erman Yükseltürk, Gwo Jen Hwang and Joyce Hwee Ling Koh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Technology & Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Technology & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Technology & Society.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Technology & Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Technology & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Technology & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Technology & Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025