Advances in Anatomic Pathology

1.2k papers and 32.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 32.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (320 papers), Oncology (307 papers) and Surgery (301 papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (128 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (80 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Anatomic Pathology are Andrew A. Renshaw, Syed A. Hoda, Nelson G. Ordóǹez, Rana S. Hoda, W. Glenn McCluggage, Robert H. Young, John K.C. Chan, John G. Batsakis, Jae Y. Ro and Cyril Fisher.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Anatomic Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Anatomic Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Anatomic Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025