Current Opinion in Biotechnology

4.4k papers and 276.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 276.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.9k papers), Biomedical Engineering (851 papers) and Plant Science (506 papers) specifically the topics of Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology (711 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (368 papers) and Enzyme Immobilization Techniques (322 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Biotechnology are Maria Daglia, François Baneyx, Derek R. Lovley, Carl E. Cerniglia, Eliana De Bernardez Clark, Robert M. Clegg, Jeffrey A. Hubbell, Jens Nielsen, Karl‐Erich Jaeger and Thorsten Eggert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Biotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025